Skip to main content

Post-Dobbs, media depicts more barriers to abortion access

New research finds that the media landscape surrounding abortion experienced change following the Dobbs decision, portraying more contemporary logistical and financial barriers to abortion access than before.

Findings: Abortion Portrayal Pre and Post Dobbs

Post-Dobbs, there was an increase in the proportion of abortion plotlines that depicted procedural abortions compared with pre-Dobbs, but no change in the consistently low proportion of medication abortion depictions.
Pre-Dobbs, the vast majority of plotlines (77%) did not portray any barriers to abortion care. Post-Dobbs, 33% depicted barriers.
Since Dobbs, more television plotlines are portraying obstacles to abortion care, yet they continue to tell stories of white, non-parenting teenagers who make up a small percentage of real abortion patients.

Implications: How Does Media Portrayal of Abortion Impact Audiences Following Dobbs?

This study’s data closely analyzes the changes of media portrayal of abortion following the Dobbs decision. The findings suggest that the media still does not accurately represent abortion patients or contemporary challenges to abortion access. Given the widespread reach of entertainment media and low levels of knowledge about abortion among the US public, these findings highlight the potential for improved media depictions to correct  broad misunderstandings about abortion. 

The researchers write:

“Given the broad reach of television, especially in the current context of confusion about abortion legality, it behooves clinicians and advocates alike to understand what audiences are learning about abortion from entertainment television.”

The article, “Women's Lives Are on the Line, and Our Hands Are Tied”: How Television Is Reckoning With a Post-Dobbs America, is available in Women's Health Issues.

Additional Resources